Monday, September 12, 2016

TO BE A PILGRIM



In 2004 the Catholic Church published an Instruction entitled The Love of Christ Towards Migrants (Erga Migrantes Caritas Christi, EMCC). It received Papal Authority on the Feast of St. Joseph the Worker:

In migrants the Church has always contemplated the image of Christ who said, “I was a stranger and you made me welcome.” Their condition is, therefore, a challenge to the faith and love of believers, who are called on to heal the evils caused by migration and discover the plan God pursues through it even when caused by obvious injustices.

Mary, the Mother of Jesus, can be well contemplated as a symbol of the woman emigrant. She gave birth to her Son away from home and was compelled to flee to Egypt. Popular devotion is right to consider Mary as the Madonna of the Way. (EMCC)

From the day Abraham left Ur to the night the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and his followers began the Hijrah from Mecca to Medina migration has been front and center as an image of spiritual growth, from dead ends to new beginnings, moving out of the darkness into the light. Holy Scripture is full of believers who became migrants for a number of reasons. Hagar and her son Ishmael were banished, thus beginning their migration. Israel was forced to take up residence in Egypt when faced with starvation, and then four hundred years later, they were homeless strangers again wayfaring through Canaan. In fact the Hebrew Law reflects a firsthand sympathy for refugees and sojourners and directs the faithful to feed, clothe, and help them, remembering how we are all the descendants of such brave, sturdy stock. Sometimes people became migrants because their lives were in danger. Jesus, Mary, and Joseph fell into this category when they fled to Egypt rather than face the wrath of jealous power.
I am related to migrants on both sides of my family. The ones on my Mother’s side were refugees. They were the Acadians of whom Longfellow wrote, driven away from their home in “the forest primeval.” Exiled from the only life they knew, those poor souls wandered “in want and cheerless discomfort, bleeding, barefooted, over the shards and thorns of existence.”  (Evangeline) I can see them even now; the women with their heads covered in imitation of Mary, favoring blue, our Lady’s color. So many places refused to allow the Acadians to take up residence. They were the despised outcasts of their day; the objects of hate, ridicule, fear, and loathing.

The term ‘refugee’ is derived from the concept of refuge. Among the ancient Hebrews certain priestly cities were appointed as ‘Cities of Refuge’. Someone responsible for taking a life but who did so unintentionally could flee to such a city. The wrathful cry of blood for blood could not reach you in a City of Refuge. That this pertained to priestly cities where worship was offered speaks to the connection between mercy and sacrifice. To this day churches still act as houses of refuge. It is why many of them paint their doors red.
The ancient Hebrews understood the connection between clemency and community. It’s not for nothing that Cain, the builder of the first city, was a murderer against whom vengeance was forbidden. From the beginning there was the recognition that there can be no living together without prevenient mercy seasoning our friendships and agreements. We cannot find our way together when each of us demands our pound of flesh, or as Gandhi put it, “an eye for an eye ends up making the whole world blind.”
                                                 
Though justice be thy plea, consider this;
That, in the course of justice, none of us
        Should see salvation: we do pray for mercy;
                                        And that same prayer doth teach us all to render
                                                The deeds of mercy.
                                                (The Merchant of Venice, Act IV, Scene 1)

 Not only did the ancients grasp the relation of mercy and sacrifice, they also understood the way mercy reinforces liberty. They knew that living together as free people means being informed by history but not controlled by it; that although they had been oppressed and taken advantage of in the past there was no need for them to treat others the same way. I suppose this is why a free Country once saw fit to summon the tired, poor, homeless, and tempest-tossed to her shores, and why a still great nation may continue to welcome wayfarers even today; and be a blessed home for Isa, Maryum, and Yusuf, as they come seeking refuge.

Monday, July 4, 2016

ADAB



I’ve been thinking about the meaning of ‘adab’. It is an Arabic word with no exact equivalent in English and has to do with kindness and good manners expressed with courtesy and refinement. It is similar to what we used to call ‘grace’ or ‘class.’ It’s what makes us civilized. I suppose this is why 16th Century French Jesuits went to the trouble of composing 110 Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation, and why, when George Washington was a schoolboy, he transcribed these rules as part of a hand-writing exercise. Penmanship was taught back then and so were manners.
John Henry Newman wrote that a true gentleman’s concern is in “merely removing the obstacles which hinder the free and unembarrassed action of those about him.” Emily Post said that possessing good manners means having “a sensitive awareness of the feelings of others”, and Ann Landers defined class as “being considerate of others.” The First of the Rules of Civility proclaims that “every action done in company ought to be with some sign of respect to those that are present.” I don’t know about you but I’m beginning to see a pattern here. Good manners are the practical expression of loving-kindness. They reflect the charity which Holy Scripture says is patient and kind, and is not boastful, proud, self-seeking, or rude. We are told that Christians are to be kindly affectionate one with another with brotherly love, and when we visit each other’s homes for meals we should do so with thankfulness, eschewing all rudeness. ‘Adab’ at its root is a term related to mealtime. It comes from a culture in which dining together is still seen as an act of communion, and everyone eats with the right hand of fellowship, and dips in a common dish.

To live together as one nation is to dip in a common dish. It requires courtesy, thoughtfulness, neighborliness, good will, a desire for fairness, and the old-fashioned virtues of prudence, courage, temperance, and justice. Above all it takes charity and a preference for getting along. In other words we cannot be civilized unless we’re civil. 

In his essay: The Spirit of Appomattox Court House, historian Douglas Brinkley wrote that “while the scars of the monstrous Civil War still remain, the wounds have closed since 1865, in large part, because of the civility of Grant and Lee.” We need civility. No Country is so surely established or has a Constitution so well devised that it can long endure when good manners are abandoned, for then we have forsaken the very virtues required in self-governance. We need grace – the inner and outer adab of charity – if we’re to have any hope of living in peace.

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

O HIDDEN …



I’m reading Coriolanus for Lent. I’m meditating on the text. It is well worth while. T. S. Eliot thought very highly of the play, and, as he often did, took the quite contrarian view that it was, together with Antony and Cleopatra, Shakespeare’s “most assured artistic success.” (The Sacred Wood, 1919) I’ll let the scholars have that debate.
Although he makes reference to the character, Coriolanus, near the end of The Waste Land, Eliot’s extended treatment of the play’s central themes is found in his unfinished collection begun in1931 entitled Coriolan.  It was written at a time when fascism was spreading in Europe and society was sagging at the knees at home. The American philosopher Russell Kirk said of the poem: “It was an appeal to true principles of public order, rooted in religion and in historical consciousness, against ideology, against the cult of personality, against the indifference or irresponsibility of the crowd, against the ‘Servile State’ described by Hilaire Belloc, and against captivity to a moment in time.” (Eliot and His Age, 1971)
There was much in Eliot’s day to cause him to reflect on Shakespeare’s treatment of the story of the ancient Roman General. The rise of Nationalism full of bold promises by great men on horseback and the marriage of technology and empire led the poet to inquire into the deeper sources of authority and meaning. He sought to reflect upon the love that animates community and makes life possible. It seems to me that making room for such reflection is one of the reasons the church observes penitential seasons. We need simply to stand still every now and then and let the parade of pomp and circumstances pass us by, and in that simplicity, to look, and to listen.

 O hidden under the dove's wing, hidden in the turtle's breast,
Under the palm tree at noon, under the running water
At the still point of the turning world. O hidden.

 Have a lovely Lent.